Accessibility
Choose your Options
CancelBlizzard Pearl IQ Ski System with Bindings (Girls')
Was $276.00
SALE: $229.99
17%Off!
SALE: $229.99
FREE SHIPPING
Quick Specs
More Info- Waist Width: 68
- Profile: Camber
Available Colors
Product Details
Waist Width |
Profile |
|---|---|
60-69: Mainly for frontside carving |
Camber: Shaped like upside-down U. Great for speed and stability. |
Style: 8A5232
Get them on their feet and headed downhill with the Blizzard Pearl IQ Ski System with Bindings. It comes packaged with Blizzard IQ 4.5 bindings that take full advantage of the integrated ABS mounting rails built into the topsheet to make the ski lighter and easier to control. A Dura-Tec design makes that topsheet thicker and puts aluminum tip and tail protectors at either end for improved durability, even if your little ripper just rips through gear.
Specs:
- Design: Girls'
- Ski Dimensions: 105/68/93
- Turn Radius: 7.0m (Size 110)
- Camber: Traditional Camber
- Binding: Blizzard IQ 4.5
Features:
- Traditional Camber Profile keeps them in control with stable and reliable edge hold
- Composite IQ Construction keeps things lightweight with a synthetic core
- Dura-Tec features like aluminum tip and tail protectors and thicker topsheets improve ski durability
- IQ Binding System uses built in ABS rails to mount bindings, reducing weight and improving flex
- Includes Blizzard IQ 4.5 Binding
- Bindings must be mounted and adjusted by a certified ski technician before use
Questions and Answers
ASK A QUESTION Got questions about this product? Ask them here. Got questions about anything else? Please see our FAQ.
Q:
"Is this an appropriate ski for a10 y.o. girl, who is at advanced intermediate level looking to make the next jump up in skill? What would you recommend? Thanks"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by a.t. on 3/1/2016 - 12:59 pm
A:
"This will be a good fit for her, the IQ bindings will deliver a lighter ski and more effortless skiing, perfect for letting her develop her technique and push her skills to the next level."
Answer by Kyle (Peter Glenn Staff) on 3/9/2016 - 9:35 am
