Accessibility
Choose your Options
Cancel
Product Details
| Profile | Waist Width |
|---|---|
Rocker/Camber Hybrid: Uses rocker in certain zones of the ski, typically the tip, tail, or both. Great, versatile choice, offering good grip on hardpack, some float in soft snow, and easy turn initiation and transitions. |
80-89: Versatile; good blend of carve and float |
Style: S1306011
The K2 AMP Rictor 82X Ti is a strong and stable carver with a more powerful feel. If you like to ski fast, or really like the way a stiff carving ski feels when you get it up on edge, the K2 AMP 82X is the ski for you. The metal laminate will add stability and dampness because it provides more torsional stiffness. K2 gave this ski All Terrain Rocker to make it easy to turn the ski despite the stiffness. The result is an extremely powerful feel, that's still very agile. An 82mm waist is great for the frontside, with a little extra width in case you encounter softer snow.
Specs:
- Design: All-Mountain
- Dimensions: 127-82-112
- Camber: All-Terrain Rocker 30% rocker/70% camber
- Turn Radius: 17m (size 177)
- Skill Level: Advanced
- Bindings: K2/Marker MXC 12 bindings included
Features:
- MOD technology provides great control without inhibiting flex
- Metal laminate adds torsional stiffness for extra stability at higher speeds
- AT Rox technology blends camber and rocker to make turning effortless
- Progressive sidecut improves performance in deeper, softer snow
- Hybritech sidewall blends cap and sidewall construction for power and performance in the turn
- Light and responsive Aspen/Paulownia core
Questions and Answers
ASK A QUESTION Got questions about this product? Ask them here. Got questions about anything else? Please see our FAQ.
Q:
"I'm 54, 5'8 and 210 pounds. I'm comfortable on blue and most black runs. I live out in Oregon so we get mixed snow conditions (lots of crud and concrete). I'm looking at the rictor 82 xti and am curious what length you recommend. I'm thinking the 170's but not sure."
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Jimra on 9/25/2013 - 11:49 pm
A:
"I'd recommend the 177's for you. You'd get more out of them if you're skiing blues and blacks. "
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 9/26/2013 - 9:41 am
Q:
"Question about Ski Length & Binding System: I'm 6'3, 190 lbs, 55 yrs old, strong intermediate (blues/double blues), but now ski mostly groomers and front side with occasional crud. I had a hip resurfaced and have had several knee surgeries, so I'm not as active as before. Of the 2014 Rictors would you recommend 177's or 184's. Also, I'd like to buy just the boards and mount my own bindings, but I'm told the "system" bindings work better. Is that true? Thanks for your help. "
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by T-RideSkier on 10/31/2013 - 2:48 pm
A:
"System bindings don't necessarily work better, they are just sold as a package set with the ski and so obviously they are a great match for the ski. For you, I would recommend the 177's. "
Answer by Martha (Peter Glenn Staff) on 10/31/2013 - 3:07 pm
Q:
"6'0" 174 lbs, 44 yrs old, and advanced intermediate (lots of blues, minimal bumps, off piste when there is pow, but following my son down the steeps occassionally) but mostly NW snow - heavier/wet, lots of night skiing. 170 or 177 length recommended?"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Jefe on 12/23/2013 - 6:24 pm
A:
"If you generally stick to the groomers then you should go with 170, but if you are the type to ski all mountain then you should go with the 177."
Answer by Martha (Peter Glenn Staff) on 12/23/2013 - 7:10 pm
Q:
"Hi, I'm 5'10", 160 lbs, Advanced skier, 50/50 groomed / off piste. Which length would you recommend?"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by SSv on 1/8/2014 - 7:55 am
A:
"Size 177 would be best for you."
Answer by Martha (Peter Glenn Staff) on 1/8/2014 - 3:16 pm
Q:
"I'm 6'2" 275lb and ski mostly blues. I'm planning to do a lot more skiing over the coming years and want a ski that will be good for me now, but will also allow me to grow into the ski as my ability increases. Do you think this is the right ski? if not, what else might you recommend and at what length?"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Big Guy on 1/29/2014 - 10:16 am
A:
"In terms of length, you'll need to go with a 184 or larger. This is an advanced level ski so it will definitely still be a great ski for you as your skills improve. You can also check out the Nordica Firearrow 84 Pro Ski System. "
Answer by Martha (Peter Glenn Staff) on 1/29/2014 - 11:40 am
Q:
"I'm 5'5", 165lbs, 57 years old. I am a high level intermediate/low level advanced skier. Will ski anything that is groomed, am learning bumps and would like to ski in the trees. I have skied the K2 Rictor82XTi and would like to know what size you recommend."
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Menlo on 3/10/2014 - 4:44 pm
A:
"This ski is more of an all-mountain ski, not a groomer specific ski. For what you're looking for I'd say a 161 would be ideal. If you really want an all-mountain ski then the 170 would be your size. "
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 3/11/2014 - 3:26 pm
Q:
"I'm a 5'6" 180lb (will probably trim down to 170lb pretty soon) 67year mid level intermediate (skiing for 3 years) 99.9% groomer skier wanting this as a step-up from a beginner ski. I mostly am looking for the a ski that will handle the Pacific Northwest concrete or crud. I'm leaning toward a 163 length and thinking the 170 might be too much ski for me. I don't ski fast but am improving my abilities and starting to speed up but tend to be pretty conservative. I want a ski that will handle both the crud and the ice well. The 163 comes up to top of my forehead."
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by KR on 3/20/2014 - 4:15 pm
A:
"Yes, the 170 will be too much ski for your needs. You need to look for something in the 160 range (158-163)."
Answer by Martha (Peter Glenn Staff) on 3/21/2014 - 9:17 am
Q:
""I'm 5'5", an athletic 167lbs & 47 years old. I would categorize myself as and advanced intermediate skier that can handle any conditions; groomed, icy, lumpy snow, powder etc. I like to ski fast with tight turns as well as have a bit of fun by skiing off the edge or cutting corners of groomed trails and dropping back in again from small drops. I have skied the K2 Rictor82XTi and would like to know what size you recommend?""
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Greg on 7/27/2014 - 11:35 pm
A:
"I'd recommend the 170 for you! You picked a great choice with this ski!"
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 7/28/2014 - 11:52 am
Q:
"I am 5'6 150 lbs, 46 year old. I need to replace a 12 years olds 168cm Rossignol ski. I am advance skier that like speed and occasionally open glades, not crazy about bumps maybe because my ski are too long? I ski between 12-18 days per years all over east-end of USA and Canada. I was wondering if I should look at 163 or 170?"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by George on 8/4/2014 - 11:44 am
A:
"This would be a really great ski for you! The 163's are going to give you the best ride! "
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 8/4/2014 - 1:14 pm
Q:
"I'm 52 years old, 6'0", 215 lbs. I'm a strong intermediate skier, comfortable on all blues, and I'll take on a black now and then. I tried the AMP Rictor 90 XTi at 177 length and did well with it, but would prefer the somewhat smaller turn radius of the 82. Would 177 still be a good length for me?"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Joe on 8/29/2014 - 4:01 am
A:
"The 170 would be a better fit for you. The 177's may work if you generally like a bit of a longer ski, however, 170 is your recommended size. "
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 8/29/2014 - 10:04 am
Q:
"Is this the 2014 or 2015 model?"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Kmatt on 9/13/2014 - 9:00 am
A:
"These are the 2013 Winter model. "
Answer by Kacy (Peter Glenn Staff) on 9/15/2014 - 9:03 am
Q:
"I am 58 yrs old, 6' 1", 175 lbs and an expert skier who likes mostly black groomers on Colorado slopes. Wondering if the 184 cm would be the appropriate size."
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by TL on 11/27/2014 - 3:02 pm
A:
"For groomers you'd want something more around 170. For all-mountain it'd be around a 180."
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 11/28/2014 - 4:38 pm
Q:
"Im 50 yrs old looking to add to my quiver.I have all mnt 89mm under foot and powder skis 101 mm looking at the K2amp.I am a advanced/expert 5'10-1/2" tall 190 lbs 170or 177
Thanks "
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by kevin G on 9/10/2015 - 2:43 pm
A:
"We'd recommend the 177's in this ski for you!"
Answer by Sarah (Peter Glenn Staff) on 9/15/2015 - 11:36 pm
Q:
"I'm 5' 11", 185 lb and ski mostly groomed blue and black hills at an intermediate to advanced level. Is the 163 or 170 length best for me? Thanks"
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Ktown Rider on 10/18/2015 - 10:33 pm
A:
"Based off of the information that you have provided for us we would recommend going with the size 170. "
Answer by kacye (Peter Glenn Staff) on 10/22/2015 - 3:33 pm
Q:
"Hello. I'm 5' 10" and 165 lbs. I'm a solid intermediate/ inspiring advanced skier and looking at the k2 amp Rictor 82. Mostly skiing east coast groomed trails, with the occasional powder. Will the 170 cm be best for me? Thank you. "
1 Answers | Answer Question
Question by Cjunior on 12/6/2016 - 2:22 am
A:
"yes, 170 would be fine. "
Answer by olson.saintlouis@peterglenn.com (Peter Glenn Staff) on 12/6/2016 - 6:12 pm
More Like This
Our Price $799.00
Available Sizes:165, 172, 179
Our Price $499.00
Available Sizes:156, 164, 172
Our Price $311.99
Available Sizes:150, 160, 170
